RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03988 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 15 January 2011 through 14 January 2012, be replaced with two EPRs for the periods 15 January 2011 through 4 July 2011 and 5 July 2011 through 16 January 2012. (Administratively corrected) 2. He be promoted to the rank of Technical Sergeant (TSgt, E-6). (Amended Request) 3. He be reinstated into the Air Force. (Amended Request) APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to a Change of Reporting Official (CRO), he should have had two EPRs written during the period in question. If this action was properly completed he would have been able to test to the rank of TSgt in 2012. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his EPRs, memorandums from his chain of command and various other documents related to his request. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 9 December 1998, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force. On 8 December 2013, he was honorably discharged in the rank of Staff Sergeant (SSgt, E-5). His narrative reason for separation is “Reduction in Force.” He served a total of 15 years active service. In a letter to the applicant dated 10 December 2013, AFPC/DPSID advised him that his first avenue of relief for his request to replace the 14 January 2012 EPR with the 4 July 2011 and 16 January 2012 electronic EPRs would be through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB). Therefore, his application was forwarded to the ERAB and his request was approved. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends the applicant's record be corrected to reflect promotion to the rank of TSgt with a Date of Rank (DOR) and Promotion Effective Date (PED) of 1 May 2013. Based on the applicant's DOR to SSgt, he would have been eligible for promotion to the rank of TSgt beginning with cycle 12E6. However, he received a referral EPR for the period 1 March 2010 through 14 January 2011 which rendered him ineligible for promotion in accordance with AFI 36-2502, Airman Promotion/Demotion Program. The applicant was considered and nonselected for promotion to the rank of TSgt during cycle 13E6. He was honorably discharged on 8 December 2013 in the rank of SSgt. AFPC/DPSIDE has reviewed this case and approved the applicant's request to replace the 14 January 2012 EPR with the 4 July 2011 and 16 January 2012 EPRs. If the 4 July 2011 nonreferral report was not in his record for cycle 12E6, he would have been eligible to test. Since he did not test to the rank of TSgt until cycle 13E6, his scores from that cycle would be applied retroactively to cycle 12E6 and he would become a TSgt select with a DOR of 1 May 2013. The complete DPSOE evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOR states that this advisory is for informational purposes only. The applicant's Date of Separation (DOS) for “Reduction in Force” was processed in accordance with AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, because he was unable to promote to the rank of TSgt. Based on his High Year of Tenure (HYT), he was discharged at the current rank of SSgt with 15 years Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS). Every enlisted individual is assigned a HYT date when they reach three years time in service. PSDM 11-110, FY13 High Year Tenure (HYT) Adjustments for SrA, SSgts, and TSgts, established the criteria for enlisted HYT. For SSgt, the established HYT date is the year and month an individual reaches 15 years TAFMS. SSgts are separated upon reaching 15 years TAFMS if they fail to progress to the next higher grade via the Weighted Airman Promotion System. The Military Personnel Data System automatically projects these individuals for separation 180 days prior to their established DOS. The applicant was separated based solely on reaching HYT for the current rank of SSgt. In the event the applicant is allowed to assume the rank of TSgt, the current basis for discharge will no longer exist and he would be able to retire at 20 years TAFMS (unless other administrative discharge proceedings are conducted by his commander prior to that time frame). The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 6 December 2013, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected as set forth below. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: a. He was promoted to the rank of TSgt, with a DOR and PED of 1 May 2013. b. He was not separated on 8 December 2013 in the grade of SSgt but on that date he was continued on active duty in the grade of TSgt. ? The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2013-03988 in Executive Session on 26 June 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 August 2013, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 10 January 2014, w/atch. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 9 May 2014. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 May 2014. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 8 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 4 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974